Since my book has not yet arrived in the mail, I'm going to
reflect on the article, "The Early Catastrophe," by Hart and
Risley.
This article discussed a study done on how much impact a child’s
first three years and family environment can have on their vocabulary. The child’s socioeconomic status is directly
related to his or her vocabulary at age three.
For me, this article was heartbreaking because the conclusion was
that there was nothing that could be done that would change the rate at which
the children acquire vocabulary. I came from a household of educated parents,
and I was always a strong reader with a large vocabulary. As I got older,
I realized that this contributed to my success in school, but I always assumed
that a student's motivation was what mattered most. However, from working
with students from diverse backgrounds throughout college, I have realized
exactly how important your home life is to your ability to do well in school.
I had not thought about what a difference the first three years make, and
this article was really eye opening in that aspect. I had a false
assumption that kids start on a *semi even playing field when they start
pre-school or kindergarten. This article
really made me think about how, as teachers, it is so important to realize that
students will have differing vocabulary and reading skills and to modify
lessons for these various levels.
Catherine,
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your opening statements! This article broke my heart as well! I was not only amazed at the great disparity in vocabulary between the 3 groups, but even more deeply saddened by the statistics regarding the "encouraging" and "discouraging" language they were exposed to. It made me think really carefully about my language that I use to relate to my students and even to correct them. I want to make sure I am accountable and reflecting on this area of my teaching. Do I need to adjust how I speak to my student in a way that really encourages them and communicates my true care for them? I also thought a lot (at the abrupt and slightly dismal end of the article) about how we can use this knowledge to modify lessons for different students.
Differentiation is TRES DIFICIL!!!!
Great thoughts!
Hannah